.

Saturday, March 2, 2019

Assignment: Bias, Rhetorical Devices, and Argumentation

Assignment Bias, rhetorical Devices, and Argumentation The speech of Kane safariing for Governor is full of bias. The bias starts from the possibleness seconds of the movie truncate and go on through the speech. The man in the rise of the movie clip demonstrated a bias in choose of Kane becoming Governor. These biases are created by labeling Charles Kane as a friend of the on the job(p) man who is an ally of the beneath paid and under fed.This same Kane campaigner offers up a disallow bias towards the opponent Jim Gettys by labeling his while in office as an evil domination. These same negative biases are continued by Kane himself, calling Jim Gettys downright dishonest. totally of these negative claims are being do without any supporting facts. The startle phantasm I noticed is that Kane is claiming to be a friend of the work man and lower class. The second is the claim that Kane has already won the campaign for Governor, and the campaign has not even started yet, whi ch is a fallacy of false conclusion.The continued attacks on Jim Gettys are an ad hominen fallacy, because the attacks are towards Gettys not the production line at hand. The next fallacy I noticed is a circular fallacy or begging the question. Kane mentions that he wants to protect the under privileged, under fed, and under paid but quickly asserts that he is too busy to shuffle any promises. Kanes speech for Governor also contains a peer rhetorical gubbinss. The first one I noticed is Kane putting redundant emphasis on certain words and phrases, I believe this is do to imply something.The first time this is done is when Kane said I made not campaign promises. There was an extra pause or refinement on the word promises implying the promises of his opponent were not kept. The next rhetorical device is when Kane said that he had more than hope, implying Jim Gettys has no hope or is hopeless. This role of rhetorical device is an antithesis. The next rhetorical device is of th e same type. It is when Kane says he would make promises now if he was not too busy recording to keep them.This is the contrasting of two separate ideas into one, single, phrase. There some candid and some weak arguments and counter arguments made in this movie clip by the campaign man in the beginning and by Kane himself. The argument that Jim Gettys is evil and dishonest is countered by the statements that Kane is the ally of the common man. This is a full argument because of the passionate method used to deliver the arguments, which makes up for the inadequacy of supporting facts.A weak argument is that every poll shows that Kane willing be elected. This is weak because this would be very difficult to prove in advance an actual election event. There is nothing to back up this claim. other argument made was at the end of the clip, Kane promises to set up a special committee to indict Jim Gettys for his wrong doing. This argument was made pursuance the statement that Kane c annot make any campaign promises, this invalidates his own argument.

No comments:

Post a Comment