Personality Features of the Entrepreneur

Personality Features of the enterpriser capacity to set graduate(prenominal) personalised but obtainable aimsThe concern of personal accomplishment, rather than reward of successKnowledge and let- harmonise to Schultz (1975) states that entrepreneur talent is not scarce innate, but may likewise improve by experience and education. entrepreneur knowledge is the important element for each company performance. Brderl et al (1992) states that the spunkyer level of Entrepreneur education bring absoluteness in the productivity, which automatically leads to increase the company profit. Hence higher productivity helps to increase efficiency and processing of management and on otherwise tends to move in the customers and participating profitably with suppliers and Investors. Hambrick and Mason(1984) also concludes that company success is totally drug-addicted on the entrepreneur Knowledge. Knowledge mainly depends on the education and the ancient experience (Barker III and Muell er 2002 Hadjimanolis 2000).By attaining good knowledge, entrepreneur develops new innovative ideas and pronounce to make them real. On the other hand Hisrich Peter (1995) Mcgrath MacMillan (2000) argues that thither is cognizance that education experience do make contribution to the function of Entrepreneurship, save these experiences may not always exclusively transpire through established educationThe environment of the different assimilation bath produce release in status (Baskerville 2003) as easily as differences in the behavior of entrepreneurial ( noth 1990 Shane 1994) culture knowledge is another aspect which can be understood by entrepreneur. According to Zhao (2010), the cultural awareness could be defined as the understanding of a peoples historical and cultural backgrounds as well as their approach to life history and their ways of living and have in minding. Therefore, as Rogers and Steinfatt (1999) argue, culture has very partful effects on mortal beha viour including entrepreneurial behaviour. Vernon et aI (1997) explained that culture is an significant in any discussion of Entrepreneurship because it determines the place of individuals towards the commencement of Entrepreneurship.Prior hand experience is considered to be beneficial for any entrepreneur and can be expected to convey a greater ability to resist unfavourable shocks and to perform corrective actions in a new venture. According to Davidsson and Honig (2003) Starr and Bygrave (1992) explains that the previous experience helps to lead to an implement skills that critically influences subsequent efforts to establish and build up new ventures. Also Shane(2000) Ucbasaran et al. (2003) concludes that the individuals who let in the multiple starts-up called habitual entrepreneur, who develops a entrepreneurial approach and trouble solving ability which automatically helps to increase their skill to recognize and put on further opportunity.Propensity to take Risk-Risk attitude influence the entire life cycle of Entrepreneur. According to Cramer et al (2002) caliendo et al (2009), on that point is positive gene linkage amongst Risk attitude and the decision to require an Entrepreneur. Entrepreneurs tend to be more independently-minded, ready to take put on the lines and accept the penalty if things go wrong.Casson (1982) concludes that risk taking ability and innovativeness are the personal characteristics and more over they have all the knowledge of handling business. Thus, people with more experience, higher abilities or greater knowledge in the field of potential self-employment tend to cover the risks connected with certain decisions as secondaryer ( Gifford 2003).Caird(1988) also agreed with Casson and concludes that made entrepreneurs have abilities and knowledge to sense business risks and profitability and try to right errors to improve business performance and prospects. On the other hand Grable and Lytton (1998) also claim that the educational level of entrepreneurs is the most important inconstant in distinguishing risk-taking intensity in businesses.Psychological theory has pointed out that the individuals risk attitude is only one of numerous personal variables possibly influencing the decision to twist an entrepreneur ( Rauch and Frese 2000). Person risk attitude is one of the key variable In the choice between a salaried job and entrepreneurship. According to Chell et al. (1991), there should be an inverse U-shaped relation between risk attitudes and entrepreneurial survival, where low risk attitudes characterize more risk averse and high risk attitudes indicate less risk averse persons. Recent look into by Baron (2004) and Kollinger et al (2007) provides further explanations for why curiously risk-seeking entrepreneurs might decide to start a business venture, even if low or even negative outcomes may arise with relatively high probability.leaders-According to Graen and Scandura(1987) Leadership is broadly viewed as an interactive process, dependent upon both draws and followers . and an entrepreneur is often described as a leader who must define a vision of what is possible and gain people to rally around that vision and transform it into reality (Kao, 1989). Hence, it is argued that there is interconnection between entrepreneurship and lead (Jensen and Luthans, 2006) and to be successful entrepreneurs must occupy leadership skills (Colbert, 2003).A leader has to be Entrepreneur aswell.It has been written that Entrepreneurial leadership deals with concepts and ideas,which are related to problems that are not of an organisational nature ( EL-Namaki 1992). Hinterhuber and Krauthammer (1998) assert that in todays turbulent environment, which demands not only continual innovation but origin improvements in all stakeholders satisfaction, leadership is more critical than ever for entrepreneurs. occasion agin states that leadership stands onthree pillars(1) Envisioning(2) B eing an example and(3) Increasing the value of the buckramAvolio et al (2004) provided a theory driven Framework for Studying Entrepreneur as a leader, with the focus on experience, self regulatory process, and leader behaviourThe above theory explores that how a entrepreneur leadership can positively linked to the organisation commitment, satisfaction of the job, happiness to his/her employees. Rhoades et al(2001) add on that when employees are treated in a fair and caring manner, they become more committed towards the organisation ,and more likely to have positive attitude. pledge- Confidence is the key to success for any individual. Very few Entrepreneur need to have important skills, out of which arrogance is very vital. Confidence helps entrepreneur to convert an idea into product line success. According to Wilson et al., (2007) self authorisation is based on the abilities and perception of the skills rather than objective ability. But orbicular Entrepreneurship Monitor(GE M) found that there is difference between the level of self assurance ability to believe in an entrepreneurs non-entrepreneurs. Minniti et al., 2004) also supports the idea of GEM that there is difference between the level of confidence in an Entrepreneur. Boyd and Vozikiss theory of intentionality helps us understand the role of confidence here too. They argue that self-efficacy not only positively influences intention, but that it also influences the transformation of intention into action (Boyd and Vozikis, 1994).While some entrepreneurs may have a clear intention to start a business, not all do, and one of the things which predicts entrepreneurial action (i.e. launch) is self-efficacy. High confidence promotes a go-ahead spirit that can lead to success amid such uncertainty (Bazerman,1998)On the other hand Forbes (2005) states that the Entrepreneur who found their give business are more over confident than those who dint. According to griffin and Varey, (1996) ,over confi dent is treated as situation specific. He means that the individual who is overconfident in one labor might not be in second one. Gist and Mitchell (1992) Social cognitive theory tells us that self-efficacy, an assessment of ones confidence, is situation specific and implemented to the particular tasks rather than a general state of being.The real power to attract money comes from our knowledge self-reliance, determination, and will not from any dependence on anothers help and support. The power to attract money comes from the psychological viewpoint that I am the net determinant of my fate. One of the reasons for Americas founding and continuous success was that her people were sacred to self-reliance.Casson, M. (1982). The Entrepreneur And economical Theory. Oxford Martin Robertson.Caird, S. (1988). A Review of Methods of Measuring Enterprising Attributes. shorthorn shorthorn University Business School.Davidsson, P. (1989). Continued Entrepreneurship and undersize Firm Busin ess. capital of Sweden Stockholm School of EconomicsBellu, R.R. (1988). Entrepreneurs and managers are they different? In Reynolds, P.D., Birley, S., Butler, J.E., Bygrave, W.D.,Bird, B. (1992). The operation of intentions intime the yield of new venture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17 (1), 11-20Brockhaus, R H. (1982). The psychology of the entrepreneur, hi Kent, C. A., Sexton, D. and Vesper. K. (Eds.), encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship (pp. 39-56). Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall.McClelland, D.C. (1961), The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ Van Norstrand CoOpportunity-According to Shane et al (2000) The major task of entrepreneur is to find out and utilize oppurtunitiesRisk taking Capability- agree toREFERENCES FOR BIT 1Baskerville, R.F. 2003. Hofstede Never Studied Culture. Accounting, Organizations and Society28(1)1-14North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. raw York Norton.Shane, S. 1994. The Effect of National Culture on t he Choice between Licensing and Direct ForeignInvestment. Strategic attention journal 15627-642.Brderl, J., Preisendorfer, P., Ziegler., R., (1992), Survival Chances of Newly Founded Organizations,American Sociological Review, Vol 57, 227-242Hambrick, D. C., Mason, P. A., (1984), Upper echelons the make-up as a reflection of its top managers,Academy of heed Review, Vol. 9, no. 2, 193-206Barker, V. L., III, Mueller, G.C., (2002), CEO characteristics and firm RD spending, Management Science, Vol. 48, no. 6, 782-801Hadjimanolis, A., (2000), A resource based view of innovativeness in tiny firms. Technology Analysis Strategic Management, Vol. 12, no. 2, 263-28Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-26Shane, S. (2000), Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities, Organization Science, Vol. 11, pp. 217-26.Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., Wright, M. and Binks, M. (2003), Does entrepreneurial experience influence opportunity identification?, The ledger of Private Equity, Vol. 7, pp. 7-14.Davidsson, P. and Honig, B. (2003), The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs, journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 18, pp. 301-31.Starr, J.A. and Bygrave, W.D. (1992), The second time around the outcomes, assets, and liabilities of prior start-up experience, in Birley, S. and MacMillan, I.C. (Eds), multinational Perspectives on Entrepreneurship Research 1991 Proceedings of the First Annual Global company on Entrepreneurship Research, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 340-63.Vernon -wortzel, H. Wortzel, L. (1997) strategic management in Global economy, deception wiley, New York, NYSchultz, T.(1975) The value of the ability to deal with disequlibria. Journal of economic literature, 13,827-846McgrathMacMillan(2000) The Entrepreneurial Mindset. capital of Massachusetts Harvard Business School Press.Caliendo et al., 2009 M. Caliendo, F. Fossen and A. Kritik os, Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs new evidence from an experimentally-validated survey, Small Business Economics 32 (2) (2009), pp. 153-167Cramer et al., 2002 J. Cramer, J. Hartog, N. Jonker and C. Van Praag, Low risk disgust encourages the choice for entrepreneurship an empirical test of a truism, Journal of Economic look and Organization 48 (2002), pp. 29-3Grable, J., Lytton, R. H. (998). Investor risk tolerance Testing the efficacy of demographics as differentiating and classifying factors. Financial Counseling and Planning, 9(1),61-73Caird, S. (1988). A Review of Methods of Measuring Enterprising Attributes. Durham Durham University Business School.Chell, E., J. Harworth, and S. Brearley (1991). The search for entrepreneurialtraits. In E. Chell, J. Harworth, and S. Brearley (Eds.), The EntrepreneurialPersonality Concepts, Cases and Categories, Routledge Small Business Series,pp. 29-53. capital of the United Kingdom Thomson LearningBaron, R. (2004). The cognitive per spective A valuable tool for respondent entrepreneurships basic why questions. Journal of Business Venturing 19, 221-240.Kollinger, P., M. Minniti, and C. Schade (2007). I think I can, I think I can Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology 28 (4),502-527.Gifford, S. (2003). Risk and uncertainty. In Z. Acs D. Audretsch (Eds.), enchiridion of entrepreneurship researchAn interdisciplinary survey and introduction (pp. 37-52).Kluwer Academic Publishers.Rauch, A., Frese, M. (2000). Psychological approaches to entrepreneurial success A general model and an overview of findings. In C. Cooper I. Robertson (Eds.), supranational review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 101-142). Wiley.Kauer, D., Waldeck, T.C. and Schaffer, U. (2007), Effects of top managerial team characteristics on strategic decision making, Management Decision, Vol. 45 No. 6, pp. 942-67.Miller, D.Dorge, C.and Toulouse, J.M. (1988), Strategeic process and content as media tors between organization, Acadamy of Managemt journal, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 544-569.McClelland, 1990. D.C. McClelland, human motivation. , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)Gartner, W.B., Bird, B.J. and Starr, J.A. (1992), Acting as if differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behavior, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Spring, pp. 13-31.Kao, R.W.Y. (1989), Entrepreneurship and Enterprise development, Holt, Rinehart Winston of Canada, TorontoJensen, S.M. and Luthans, F. (2006), Entrepreneurs as authentic leaders impact on employeesattitudes, Leadership Organization Development Journal, Vol. 27 No. 8, pp. 646-66.Colbert, F. (2003), Entrepreneurship and leadership in marketing the arts, International Journalof Arts Management, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 30-9.Avolio, B.J. and Luthans, F. (2006), The High Impact Leader Moments number in Accelerating Authentic Leadership Development, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R. and Armeli, S. (2001), Affectiv e commitment to the organizationthe contribution of perceived organizational support, Journal of Applied Psychology,Vol. 86, pp. 825-6Hinterhuber, H.H. and Krauthammer, E. (1998), The leadership stray the tasks entrepreneurs and senior executives cannot delegate, Strategic Change, Vol. 7, pp. 149-62Wilson, F., Kickul, J. and Marlino, D. (2007), Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions implications for entrepreneurship education, Entrepreneurship Theory Practice, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 387-406Minniti, M., Arenius, P. and Langowitz, N. (2004), Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2004 Report on Women and Entrepreneurship, The Center for Womens Leadership at Babson College,Babson Park, MAForbes, D.P. (2005), Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others?, Journalof Business Venturing, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 623-40.Gist, M.E. and Mitchell, T.R. (1992), Self-efficacy a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 183-211.Griffin, D.W. and Varey, C.A. (1996), Towards a consensus on overconfidence, Organizational Behavior and kind Decision Processes, Vol. 65 No. 3, p. 227Bazerman, M.H. (1998), Judgement in Managerial Decision-making, John Wiley Sons, NewYork, NYBoyd, N.G. and Vozikis, G.S. (1994), The influence of self-efficacy on the development ofentrepreneurial intentions and actions, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 63-77